Games and odds · free tool

Wingo analyst: what an analysis of results can show

Paste a list of results and get the analysis that can honestly be done: counts, streaks and runs, each compared with what random results look like.

Tool · runs in your browserNothing is uploaded

Type or paste them. Spaces, commas, new lines or nothing between results all work. In digits mode every digit is one result, and big means 5 to 9 and small 0 to 4 (the common description; if your app shows big and small differently, paste its own B and S results in two-sides mode). In colours mode use G, R and V, or the words green, red, violet.

Try an example:
100digits read
p = 0.32digit counts against the expected shares: consistent with random
7longest streak, big or small (usually 7 in a list this long)
54%of random lists this long hold a streak that long
17%of 1,000 random lists the same length looked unusual on at least one check
4.9%looked unusual on the counts alone (the 5% line)
48 runsabout 51 expected: consistent with random
14 of 24bets “the opposite after 3 in a row” that came off (50% by chance): consistent with random

All 5 checks on these 100 digits look consistent with random. Random lists this long look unusual on at least one check 17% of the time, so one odd check proves little, and none of it says anything about the next result.

What was checked in these 100 digits
CheckYour listRandom listsVerdict
Count of each digitχ² = 10.4 on 9 degrees of freedomusually below 16.9Consistent with random (p = 0.32)
Big against small47 big, 53 smallabout 50 eachConsistent with random (p = 0.55)
Longest streak (big or small)7 small in a rowusually 7; 7 or more in 54% of random listsConsistent with random (p = 0.54)
Runs (how often the result switches)48 runsabout 50.8 (usually 41 to 61)Consistent with random (p = 0.64)
Bet the opposite after 3 in a row14 of 24 (58%)50% (usually 29% to 71% for 24 bets)Consistent with random (p = 0.54)

Random lists look odd too

This draws 1,000 random lists the same length as yours, runs the same checks on each and counts how many look unusual. It uses random numbers from your browser on your own device. There is no money in it, nothing is saved or sent, and it is not any app’s game.

An analyst, in the sense people search for it, looks at a history and draws a conclusion. The history can be counted and compared with random lists, and that is what happens here. The conclusion about the next result is where it stops: the example list of 100 digits has a longest streak of 7, which is ordinary.

If a list you paste does look unusual, the right reading is that random lists rarely look like it, not that a next result can be found. Collect more results and look again.

The page runs in your browser and sends nothing anywhere. Use the shares your own app states if you change the colour settings.

Common questions

Can an analyst tell me the next Wingo result?

No. The next result is a fresh draw that no list of past results can reveal. An analysis can measure the past, such as how often each digit came up, but that measurement does not point at the next round. Be careful with anyone who sells one.

What can an analysis of past results actually show?

It can show whether the counts, streaks and switches in a list look like random results or not. That is useful for checking a record you kept yourself, and it says nothing about the round that comes next.

Should I install an analyst app to check results?

You do not need to. The checks on this page run in your browser and ask for no access to your phone. Treat any file that wants permissions to analyse results with care, and check it with the file fingerprint tool before you open it.

How can I test a claim that an analyst is usually right?

Ask for its calls before the round happens, write them down for a few hundred rounds and count the hits. Calls picked out after the round prove nothing. Chance alone gives the hit rate of the bet itself, and a short run above that is luck far more often than skill.

Why does the page run several checks at once?

Each check looks for a different kind of pattern: counts, streaks, switching and a popular rule. Running several also shows how easily random lists trip at least one, which is why the simulation under the tool is worth a look.

More on the colour history analyser

The full tool